FIRST PUBLISHED 5/2/2012
SOME OF THE MANY SAYINGS OF PINICCIO ROBINSON.
‘The case will be over shortly. The summary on the blog is, as usual, riddled with both factual and legal inaccuracies as will become clear to everyone shortly. It is so wrong, that I seriously doubt if the advice it purports to interpret actually came from the firm of lawyers in question.’
‘The court case will conclude shortly with little cost to the trust, despite anything you may read on blogs or e-mails from a third party.’
‘…there is a lot of misinformation about what is going on, including the major issue described as a technicality by the ill informed.’
‘It is being dropped for legal reasons that make it impossible to carry on …’’
‘We should not now go to a proof. …The facts are that if we win, we will only stand to gain a few pence in the pound at best.’
‘Jim Gallacher had no right to defend this case.’
‘If Ernie did not know, his client has let him down fairly badly as the trust deed has major ramifications for the case. If he did know then his egotistical all seeing eye has failed to grasp some fundamentals of insolvency law and knowing and not disclosing it shows him for the manipulative and disturbed creep that he is.’
‘Its a truism that many solicitors have only the vaguest understanding of insolvency…….He should know that his client has no locus to defend the case.’
‘It is no longer legally competent for us to pursue Jim Gallacher any more than he has any locus to continue.’
THE SAYINGS OF DR. CREEPIN (CHRIS MCCORKINDALE)
‘On the Stars thing: we are NOT pursuing an action as such; we’ve had the case sisted and will resist any attempt to revive it. If we are able to draw a line here we’ll call an SGM to give account for the whole saga to members and loan note holders alike.’
‘Again, this is for the SGM. In short: because, in our view, the defender lacked the locus to defend the action. Therefore, in our view, the case CANNOT proceed because it is (for reasons that were unknown at the time of raising the action) legally incompetent to pursue it.’
‘It doesn’t matter what is at stake if the law doesn’t allow us to pursue the claim through the court.’
‘Jim failed to notify us that he had entered into a Trust deed and therefore (a) lacked the power to defend an action,’
‘The costs to date have been minimal, less than four figures.’
BASED ENTIRELY ON THE OBJECTIVE OPINIONS OF THE DEFENDER’S SOLICITOR AND TRUSTEE IT SEEMS CLEAR THAT PINICCIO ROBINSON AND DR. CREEPIN DELIBERATELY DECEIVED THE TRUST MEMBERSHIP.
The Greenock Morton Trust Chairman desperately dredged up Mr. Gallacher’s Trust Deed last Autumn after learning from the Trust’s solicitors that its ‘open and shut’ case was unlikely to stand scrutiny in court. Let there be absolutely no doubt about this – the signing of that Trust Deed has no legal bearing whatsoever on the Trust’s Small Claims action.
ROBINSON ‘CONJURED UP’ A FICTITIOUS AND LEGALLY UNENFORCEABLE ‘DEBT’ KNOWING FULL WELL THAT A TRUSTEE MAY ADJUDICATE ONLY ON PROVEN DEBT, AND THAT ABOVE ALL ELSE HE MUST PROTECT TRUE CREDITORS FROM PIRATES!
Furthermore, current legislation would not prevent the hearing from taking place – even should a TRUE debt exist. Robinson and his partners snubbed a £3,500 bond put up to cover the trust’s costs, instead blatantly lying about ‘only getting 15p in the £’. The simple fact is that those creatures are TERRIFIED to go anywhere near court!
Piniccio’s shameless scam was the Trust Committee’s final and futile attempt to absolve itself from reprehensible and arguably criminal activities. The experienced insolvency practitioner, INSTRUCTED the Trust’s solicitor, knowing full well that ‘many solicitors have only the vaguest understanding of insolvency’. His word was accepted as ‘gospel’.
In citing that non existent ‘debt’ while falsely claiming that the court case ‘could not proceed’, Robinson deliberately lied, OR DEMONSTRATED SHOCKING IGNORANCE OF HIS OWN SPECIALTY!
Dr. Creepin – the Trust’s 29 year old ‘legal expert’ who willingly spread the word of ‘GOD’ without even bothering to check those big books of his is equally culpable.
THAT THE TRUST’S SOLICITOR AND MEMBERSHIP HAVE BEEN MISINFORMED IN A WELL PUBLICISED ATTEMPT TO OBSTRUCT THE LEGAL PROCESS IS IRREFUTABLE. ATTEMPTING TO PERVERT THE COURSE OF JUSTICE IS A CRIMINAL OFFENCE!
The case will return to court when a sheriff will hopefully INSIST on a proof hearing, despite the inevitable Trust plea for dismissal of ITS OWN action!
Independent jurisdiction was the whole purpose of that action. That is what the Trust ALWAYS stated would be achieved after the C.I.D. threw out their complaint, and it remains the only morally acceptable way of bringing the matter to a conclusion. Without proper closure the Trust cannot move on.
When inevitably confronted with the truth, ‘GOD’ and Dr. Creepin will argue that ‘they only acted on legal advice’. THAT IS A LIE!
Last Autumn, when the Trust was informed by Messrs. Blair and Bryden that their case was unlikely to succeed, THAT was their legal advice.
The solicitors have subsequently TAKEN INSTRUCTIONS from the Trust Chairman and ‘scamster’ in chief. That is QUITE DIFFERENT!
The truth will be made public in due course – just as Mortonjag always promised.