WHAT A PLONKER!

FotoFlexer_Photo

ADAPTED FROM A POSTING OF 17/1/2012 – ROBINSON’S QUOTATIONS IN RED. 

‘Then there is his (Mortonjag’s) “unique” interpretation of the truth and propensity to make up the law as he goes along, holding it out to be factual.’

In Robinson’s accounts, Sean Donnelly was DEEMED to have tossed over two hundred pounds of ticket income into a bucket – ALL IN FIVERS – when the evidence suggested quite the opposite. That typified Robinson’s interpretation of truth! 

‘Well, I have worked with all of the present trust board for the last 18 months or so and I can tell you that they are all straight, decent people doing what they do for the betterment of Greenock Morton.’

They all fucked off when G.M.S.T. no longer suited the C.V. Only thick plonker Feeney remains!

‘As for transparency, we have been engaged in a court case and we have not been prepared to discuss the detail of it on a public forum. It’s called behaving professionally.’

Robinson repeatedly discussed detail when that suited him – both on greenockmorton.org and on the now defunct Trust forum. Astonishing behaviour from a so called ‘professional’.

FotoFlexer_Photo

‘We promised we would report to members and are holding an SGM to which loan note holders are invited, partly for that purpose given that the case is more or less over. That last statement is not arrogance, merely fact!’

That last statement was anything BUT fact and displayed shocking ignorance of reality. The case was over only when the Sheriff finally dismissed Robinson’s frivolous action.

‘I want to move things on now and I am hoping that our actions and deeds will demonstrate pursuit of our core objectives.’ 

Rubberskin’s core objective was to become an established Rae toady. He has left his mess in the incapable hands of Alain de Mode!

FotoFlexer_Photo

 ‘The case will be over shortly. The summary on the blog is, as usual, riddled with both factual and legal inaccuracies as will become clear to everyone shortly. It is so wrong, that I seriously doubt if the advice it purports to interpret actually came from the firm of lawyers in question.’ 

The summary on the blog was entirely accurate, which became clear in due course. Mr. Robinson was so wrong that Mortonjag doubted that he’d ever encountered such a case before in his professional ‘puff’!

EITHER THAT OR HE WAS DELIBERATELY DECEIVING THE TRUST MEMBERSHIP.

‘Of course I would prefer people not to have a view of me based on my role in trying to sort out a mess, not of my making but which I have approached honestly as anyone who does know anything about what I have done will attest. Does anyone seriously think I would put a forty year career as a chartered accountant at risk over a £2/3000 debt?’

TOADMEISTER’s arrogance had precluded risk assessment. If he had indeed approached the matter ‘honestly’ the number of ‘mistakes’ made cast serious doubt on his professional ability. He even failed in ‘Due diligence’ before raising the court action!

FotoFlexer_Photo.jpg

‘I have offered to any trust member or loan note holder who has concerns to go over why the trust has acted the way it has and that offer still stands. Members have every entitlement to ask questions about how the trust has operated. I would expect you can see the difference between that and posting details of an ongoing court case on an open forum like this.

Mortonjag has documented evidence of such ‘goings over in private’ within the ever expanding (a.k.a. bustin’ at the seams) ‘I.C.A.S.’ file.

FotoFlexer_Photo

‘Without wishing to stir the pot, I am intrigued to know why you think we are not sorting out our “own mess” as you put it. The court case will conclude shortly with little cost to the trust, despite anything you may read on blogs or e-mails from a third party.’

Mortonjag humbly suggested that the outcome would be entirely up to a Sheriff.

‘What troubles are those? If you are referring to the court case, all will become clear in due course but there is a lot of misinformation about what is going on, including the major issue described as a technicality by the ill informed.’

The major issue was that in attempting to apply insolvency law to a non-existent debt – a debt conjured up all by himself  – Robinson’s desperate last ditch attempt to save face was always a non- starter…. 

….AND AS ROBINSON KNEW BETTER THAN MOST, A TRUSTEE MAY NOT ADJUDICATE ON A CLAIM WITHOUT PROOF THAT THE CLAIM IS VALID.  ROBINSON AND HIS PARTNERS IN CRIME HAD ABSOLUTELY NO PROOF OF DEBT. 

‘No it is not correct! It is being dropped for legal reasons that make it impossible to carry on…’ 

FotoFlexer_Photo

THAT MISINFORMATION WAS ENTIRELY AT ODDS WITH THE CONCERTED VIEWS OF SEVERAL TRUST DEED SPECIALISTS AND EXPERTS ON INSOLVENCY LAW.

‘You have to be in possession of all the facts to make your mind up about what is fair but my understanding is that the whole case has been funded by a third party and has not cost the defendant a bean! – if the Dr who never tells lies is to be believed!’

The arrogant blustering buffoon was never in possession of ‘all the facts’, though he willingly bought into thief Donnelly and perjurer Dunco’s packs of lies to suit his power hungry agenda. The ‘Dr who never tells lies’ WAS to be believed!

That ‘funding’ was entirely legitimate, and incorporated a £3,500 bond to cover the Trust’s claim and costs should it win the court action, but ROBINSON AND HIS CRONIES FLATLY REFUSED TO SIGN A MINUTE OF AGREEMENT TO THE BOND BECAUSE THEY WERE TERRIFIED TO LET THE STARS OF ’79 CASE ANYWHERE NEAR A SHERIFF!