Part 5 – ‘IN CAHOOTS’?
Summarising an eight page submission to Mr. Gallacher’s Trustee in December 2011, solicitor Andrew Upton of Harper Macleod LLP stated…..
That claim was merely a ‘scam’ to put off the evil day, and the evidence submitted to the Trustee was IDENTICAL to that in the Small Claims writ.
It was only a matter of time before the Trustee would be forced to reject the claim and the matter brought back to court for a decree in Mr Gallacher’s favour – or so it seemed to those who knew.
OTHERS HAD DIFFERENT IDEAS!
TOADMEISTER clearly expected a favourable outcome for the G.M.S.T!
That is the only possible conclusion to be drawn from his comments HERE, and the Trust’s next A.G.M. to which he alluded should have been held by the end of June 2015.
WHY THEN, DID THAT A.G.M. NEVER TAKE PLACE, AND WHY WAS THAT ‘DIRECTORS’ REPORT’ HASTILY CONCEALED FROM THE MEMBERSHIP?
Mortonjag is of the view that Mr Gallacher’s correspondence with his Trustee on 2nd June 2015 inconvenienced an ‘understanding’ between the latter and THE TOADMEISTER.
WERE FELLOW BEAN COUNTERS, ROBINSON AND FORSYTH ‘IN CAHOOTS’?
More soon folks!